The correct answer is an Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise (illicit negative).Important PointsAffirmative conclusion from a negative premise (illicit negative)It is a formal fallacy that is committed when a categorical syllogism has a positive conclusion and one or two negative premises"Some good actors are not strong men is a negative premise All professional wrestlers are strong men. is a positive premise Therefore, All professional wrestlers are good actors." this is a positive conclusionTherefore the fallacy in the question asked is an Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise (illicit negative) fallacy. Additional InformationIllicit major fallacy:It is a formal fallacy committed in a categorical syllogism that is invalid because its major term is undistributed in the major premise but distributed in the conclusion. This fallacy has the following argument form: All A are B. No C is A.Illicit minor fallacyIt is a formal fallacy committed in a categorical syllogism that is invalid because its minor term is undistributed in the minor premise but distributed in the conclusion. This fallacy has the following argument form: All A are B. All A are CThe fallacy of the undistributed middle:It is a formal fallacy that is committed when the middle term in a categorical syllogism is not distributed in either the minor premise or the major premiseIn this example, distribution is marked in boldface:All Z is BAll Y is BTherefore, all Y is ZB is the common term between the two premises (the middle term) but is never distributed, so this syllogism is invalid.B would be distributed by introducing a premise that states either All B is Z, or Some B is Z.